bplex wrote: "And you are posting this to accomplish... what?....But, getting back my original
statement, you are not going to accomplish anything by making a post like that, at least not
here. Most of the people who use vShare probably do not care that licensing exists or is
even required for 4.X players."

Yes exactly my point. Most don't care because they don't know that you are encouraging this copyright
violation. I didn't "go after" anyone as your post suggests. I made a general statement not directed at any
one person. You on the other hand obviously "went after" me. And you are lying when you say "most
people" have switched to a commercial player. "Most people" don't have that capability.
It's called "sharing information". I am interested in educating people on Internet copyright, but obviously
that's not a concern here. No I don't work for JW, and if you weren't so defensive and ignorant, you'd be
able to see from my post that I am not a fan of longtail.

The fact that you blocked my profile after I made this one post shows me that you know I'm right and
that I hit a nerve. I see a lot of bitching on this board about stolen scripts, etc. Pretty much says it all.

bplex also wrote: "the JW player included with vShare is the 3.X player which was released before the commercial requirement existed and, thus, is exempt from licenses."

Bplex your ignorance or ability to just lie about situations that make you uncomfortable is showing. Jw media player 3 ALSO required a paid license to use it commercially. http://www.download.com/JW-FLV-Media-Pl ... 97402.html - "Please purchase a Creative Commons License if you are using the JW FLV Media Player for commercial purposes." That's the version 3 page on download.com

Big boy posted "I would assume that JW is aware that their video player is in this very active paid script. I would also assume that the developer isn't having issues with this company or it would have been removed by now.
Also i would olmost put money on it that this scripts generates JW money. Also who's not to say they dont have a deal worked out? How do you know a certain chunk of the script sale dont go their way?"

I'm sure you would "assume". But you assume incorrectly. JW LOSES money every time this script is sold because the developers do not alert you and others to the true nature of the theft taking place. How much of the $10 paid for this script do you think goes towards the $70 licensing fee that JW requires? Won't take you too many fingers to figure that out.

The subject of copyright is an important issue but your reply shows that it's not that important to YOU. I guess trying to educate about copyright in this forum is a little like arguing with a drunk. You - Bplex - obviously are making a ton of mony from selling mods to this stolen script and is why your hackles are up, and your brain is shut down.

Feel free to delete this account, but the thread has been copied and fowarded to the JW developers, whom I assure you will be quite interested.